5 Comments to “Proving Calvinism Without Paul Part 6 – James”

  1. A. Davis

    Dec 3rd, 2009

    “That is certainly not because the book sounds Arminian, but because it sounds like it’s denying justification by faith, itself.”

    FWIW: the fact that it doesn’t necessarily have any easily found pro-Calvinist verses doesn’t make it Arminian. Its completely possible to be Biblical, yet be neither Calvinist nor Arminian.

  2. Les

    Dec 3rd, 2009

    Sorry if it came across wrong. It wasn’t my intention to say it had to be one or the other. I was simply saying it wasn’t especially Calvinist, but that’s not because it was Arminian.

    I was trying to be honest about my findings while also assuring the readers that it’s not because free-will ideas are present (which, I think, would be the natural assumption of a curious reader that has always been taught that free-will is found in scripture).

  3. [...] Proving Calvinism Without Paul Part 6 – James [...]

  4. [...] Proving Calvinism Without Paul Part 6 – James [...]

  5. [...] Proving Calvinism Without Paul Part 6 – James [...]


Leave a Reply

  • Resources

  • Sanctified Blogs